Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Tim Tebow Shouldn't Play: The Debate Is On

The "Tim Tebow shouldn't play" (against LSU) meme is going mainstream today.

It has been interesting to watch the progression: From "Can he play?" to "Will he play?" to "Should he play?" (I have a big take on this coming later on Yahoo -- will post here.)

Since Sunday, I have been clear that that is my opinion -- and I'm not alone:

Over the weekend, EDSBS's Orson Swindle got right out in front.

Yesterday,'s Gregg Doyel chimed in (even if I didn't like the premise of his argument, I agreed with the larger point).

And overnight, the AP's Jim Litke weighed in with a well-reported, well-reasoned column supporting Tebow not playing; the risks -- more accurately, the unknowns -- are just too great.

(Even the Huffington Post got in on it, through contributor Dr. Johnny Benjamin, reinforcing that what we -- what doctors -- know about brain science is still too iffy to risk it.)

Capping it all was a front-page story in today's New York Times, about a new study that shows that NFL players -- and by extension, high-level college football players -- are vastly more likely to develop conditions like dementia than the average person.

Now, that might seem obvious, but only 4 days into Tebow's post-concussion life (wow: has it only been 4 days? feels like 4 weeks), it seems entirely relevant to the discussion.

As I will explain at length shortly, the big question of the next 11 days isn't whether or not Tebow CAN play against LSU. But whether or not he SHOULD play.

No comments:

Post a Comment