The best quarterback on the field Saturday wasn’t the 2007 Heisman winner. While Tebow threw for more yards than McElroy (247-234) he wasn’t nearly as effective. Tebow was 20 of 35 for a completion percentage of 57.1%, while McElroy had a 66.7% completion percentage (12-18). By quarterback rating Tebow was 120.14, while McElroy was a sterling 196.54.Read the whole analysis here.
Tebow simply didn’t play a very good game. He wasn’t particularly pressured (Alabama didn’t sack him once), but many of his throws were ill advised or seriously off target. He failed to find wide open receivers all day, and his sole interception was a game killer.
It might be heresy, but I’m going to say it - the quarterback of the last 2 seasons wasn’t here this year.
Tebow had a QB rating of 172.5 in 2007 when he won the Heisman, and a rating of 172.4 last year. This season, against far easier opponents than either ’07 or ’08, it was a 155.6. I can see only two reasons –
1. The talent he had around him in ’07 and ’08 made him look better than he was.
2. “Something” happened to account for the loss in effectiveness.
He remains an effective runner, but was much less efficient passing this year than the last two.
In the end, Tebow didn’t lose this game singlehandedly (I believe it was much more on the defense), but he couldn’t bail us out.
Monday, December 7, 2009
Tim Tebow Role in Alabama Loss
From the SECCG post-mortem of the essential Saurian Sagacity:
Posted by Dan Shanoff at 11:30 AM